Skip to main content

Table 5 The pooled estimates of drinking rates (last 30 days) among different groups by using DerSimonian-Laird random-effect model

From: Estimate of adolescent alcohol use in China: a meta-analysis

Outcome variable

Subgroup

Number of studies

Pooled estimate

95 % CI

I 2

Q between

Middle school male students’ drinking rate

 

Location south

11

21.8

18.8, 25.2

93.9

2.47

 

Location north

7

28.7

21.0, 37.8

98.3

 

Middle school female students’ drinking rate

 

Location east

14

16.6

14.6, 18.9

92.0

3.26

 

Location middle

3

8.5

3.9, 17.4

96.8

 
 

Location west

3

17.0

9.8, 27.8

97.7

 
 

Collector (Yes)

17

16.8

13.8, 20.2

95.3

4.0*

 

Collector (No)

3

8.1

3.9, 16.1

97.2

 

High school male students’ drinking rate

 

Location east

7

33.4

28.9, 38.2

94.6

5.05*

 

Location middle

2

24.4

7.0, 58.1

99.5

 
 

Location west

3

54.2

35.7, 71.6

98.1

 
 

Collector (Yes)

10

39.3

33.5, 45.5

97.9

.956

 

Collector (No)

2

24.0

7.0, 56.7

98.5

 
 

Definition (Yes)

6

29.1

21.7, 37.8

98.4

5.024*

 

Definition (No)

6

44.6

34.1, 55.5

98.2

 

High school female students’ drinking rate

 

Location east

7

21.5

17.3, 26.2

95.8

2.89

 

Location middle

2

10.9

3.7, 28.1

98.5

 
 

Location west

3

30.8

14.9, 53.1

98.7

 
 

Collector (Yes)

10

24.1

18.9, 30.2

98.3

3.63*

 

Collector (No)

2

10.1

3.9, 23.9

96.2

 
 

Definition (Yes)

6

15.4

11.5, 20.1

98.9

5.68*

 

Definition (No)

6

28.4

18.6, 40.8

96.4

 
  1. N = 20 for middle school males and females, N = 12 for high school males and females, N = 6 for vocational high school males and females. *p < .1. Only studies that contained the moderator information are included in the group comparisons. For middle school students, the location for two studies that included samples from more than one region were deleted from the comparison [18, 19]